What does this cost, and how does the ROI actually work for an agency our size?›
Our monthly fees are typically 40–60% less than what you'd pay a full-time sales manager with comparable experience. For most commercial insurance agencies, one mid-sized commercial account won through a more disciplined hunting process covers a full month's investment. The ROI question really becomes: what is an additional $200K–$500K in new annual premium worth to your agency's book value over the next three years? The math on new business production usually works itself out — and it compounds.
How can you manage our producers if you've never worked in insurance?›
Every agency we've spoken with raises this concern, and it's a fair one. Here's what we learned over a nine-year engagement managing a commercial insurance team: the coverage knowledge was never the problem. Their producers knew their markets. What they lacked was a structured cadence for new account activity, a process for qualifying prospects against the agency's carrier appetite, and someone holding them accountable for hunter behavior rather than renewal service. That's what we provide. Your principal handles the technical expertise. We handle the sales discipline — and the two don't interfere with each other.
How long do we have to commit to this?›
We work month-to-month, the same way most employees do. We don't lock agencies into annual contracts because we'd rather earn our place each month than be carried by a signed agreement. That said, what we build takes time — the pipeline discipline, the behavioral change in producers, the comp structure revisions — and most of that value compounds between months 3 and 12. We ask that you give the process enough runway to work. But the commitment is mutual, not contractual.
What does a typical week actually look like for our team when you're involved?›
Every week we run a producer meeting focused entirely on new account activity: which X-dates are in development, which COI conversations happened, which discovery calls are on the calendar, and what first appointments were completed with new prospects. Each producer gets a monthly one-on-one where we review their activity trends and coach on specific prospecting situations. Between those sessions, we're available by phone or email when a producer is working through a complex prospect conversation or a difficult renewal situation. We are your sales manager — just not in the office every day.
Is this right for an agency our size? We have five producers and about $4M in commission revenue.›
That's exactly our sweet spot. We work best with independent agencies and financial advisory firms in the $3M–$20M revenue range with two to eight outside producers who are responsible for finding and winning new commercial accounts — not just servicing existing clients or responding to inbound referrals. If your model is entirely inbound, we're probably not the right fit, and we'll tell you that. But if you have producers who are supposed to be hunting new business and aren't doing it consistently, we can change that.
We'd need you more involved than a few hours a week — we don't see how that can actually move our producers to prospect.›
This is the most important question you can ask, and we want to answer it directly. Our model is built on quality of structure, not quantity of contact. What we've found — including in a nine-year insurance agency engagement — is that a full-time manager checking in daily often creates dependency rather than accountability. Producers wait for the manager to keep them motivated instead of developing the habits that produce results on their own. What we build is a system: clear expectations for new business activity, a weekly accountability rhythm, and a pipeline process producers own. If you believe your team needs daily hand-holding to function, we'd rather know that now — because that's a sign the problem may be bigger than a sales manager can fix, and it may mean we're not the right fit. The agencies that get the best results with us are the ones where the principal steps back and trusts the structure.
How long before we actually see our producers behave differently?›
Behavioral change in a production team typically stabilizes in 60–90 days — longer if you have senior producers who've been farming their books for years without any new business accountability. In the first 30 days, we focus on assessment and establishing clear activity expectations. By day 60–90, the weekly rhythm is set and producers are being held to it. New commercial accounts don't usually close in the first quarter — the sales cycle for mid-market risks runs 12–18 months in most cases. But you'll see the activity shift well before the revenue shows up: more COI outreach, more X-dates in the pipeline, more discovery calls on the calendar. That's where the growth starts.
Our top producer has been with us for ten years and manages a $1.5M personal book. Won't accountability structures push her away?›
This is a real concern, and we take it seriously. What we've found is that strong producers are rarely threatened by structure — they're often frustrated that others aren't held to the same standard. What typically triggers pushback from experienced producers is being managed on coverage decisions or client relationships they've built over years. We don't touch that. Our accountability focuses entirely on new business activity: who they're prospecting, which COIs they're cultivating, what's in their new account pipeline. Producers with strong books and healthy habits usually welcome that conversation. The ones who resist are often the ones who stopped hunting years ago — and that's a conversation worth having.